SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 727

R.K.AGRAWAL, SAROJ BALA
RAJAN NISHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


R. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) IN all these four writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the notice dated 17. 1. 2006 issued by the District Magistrate/collector, Allahabad, respondent no. 2, by which applications have been invited for grant of mining lease in respect of sand for a period of three years for the vacant areas mentioned therein and separate orders dated 23. 11. 2005 passed by the District Magistrate/collector, Allahabad, cancelling the sanction/approval dated 31. 3. 2001 regarding grant of lease in favour of the petitioners.

( 2 ) AS the counter affidavit and the rejoinder affidavit have been exchanged between the parties in all the writ petitions, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, all the writ petitions are being heard and finally disposed of at the admission stage itself in accordance with the Rules of Court.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts giving rise to the present petitions are as follows:-According to the petitioners, the Government of Uttar Pradesh issued an order on 30. 12. 2000 declaring the entire area in the State of U. P. for grant of mining lease and directing the District Magistrates of various districts in the State of U. P. to de









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top