BARKAT ALI ZAIDI
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
LALLAN – Respondent
( 1 ) THE respondent who is an employee in a factory, suffered injury in his right ear and was referred by the Corporation to the Medical board for Medical Examination for determination of his disablement as postulated in Section 54-A of the employees State insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) read with Regulation-72 of the year 1950 under the Act.
( 2 ) THE Medical Board in its report dated february 20, 1992 noted that the test does not reveal hearing loss and there was no disablement injury, and, therefore, the employee was not entitled to any disablement benefit. The employee then went before the employees State Insurance Court, Kanpur. He did not file an appeal before the Medical appellate Tribunal against the decision of the medical Board because he had the option to go straight to the Court by virtue of the provisions as contained in Clause-II sub-section (2) of section 54-A of the Act. The provision is as follows :" (2) If the insured person or the Corporation is not satisfied with the decision of the medical Board, the insured person or the corporation may appeal in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time to- (i) the Med
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.