SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1507

BARKAT ALI ZAIDI
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
LALLAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NEERAJ AGRAWAL, Rajesh Tiwari, Ramakant Mishra, Yogendra Kumar Srivastava

BARKAT ALI ZAIDI, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent who is an employee in a factory, suffered injury in his right ear and was referred by the Corporation to the Medical board for Medical Examination for determination of his disablement as postulated in Section 54-A of the employees State insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) read with Regulation-72 of the year 1950 under the Act.

( 2 ) THE Medical Board in its report dated february 20, 1992 noted that the test does not reveal hearing loss and there was no disablement injury, and, therefore, the employee was not entitled to any disablement benefit. The employee then went before the employees State Insurance Court, Kanpur. He did not file an appeal before the Medical appellate Tribunal against the decision of the medical Board because he had the option to go straight to the Court by virtue of the provisions as contained in Clause-II sub-section (2) of section 54-A of the Act. The provision is as follows :" (2) If the insured person or the Corporation is not satisfied with the decision of the medical Board, the insured person or the corporation may appeal in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time to- (i) the Med

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top