SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1494

SHIV SHANKAR
JAI DURGA ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Devendra Saini, I.P.Singh

( 1 ) APPLICATION under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed by M/s Jai Durga enterprises and Dharmendra Singh, applicants against respondent No. 2, M/s Indo automobiles praying to quash the order dated 2. 4. 2005 passed in criminal case No. 1113/ 2005, m/s Indo auto Mobiles vs. M/s jai Durga Enterprises, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. P. S. Kotwali nagar, District Saharanpur passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st, Saharanpur whereby the applicants/accused were summoned for trial.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts arising out of this application are that opposite party No. 2, M/s Indo automobiles filed criminal complaint against the above applicants/accused, wherein it was stated that he was manufacturer of tractors under the name of Indo Firm Equipment Limited and supplying tractors to its customers and under the transaction of said tractor the applicants were liable to pay Rs. 13,22,000/- to which the applicants have given a cheque of Rs. 13,22,000/- dated 29. 4. 04 to opposite party no. 2/complainant, which was presented by him in his banker and the same was dishonoured by the bank After the dishonour of the cheque, opposite party No. 2 gave a notice on 18. 5. 2004 to the applicant
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top