( 1 ) THIS revision has been preferred by the revisionist Sanjay Chaurasia against the judgment and order dated 27-6-2005, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, meerut in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2005, (Sanjay Chaurasia v. State of U. P.), whereby the party for bail of the revisionist being a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 has been refused in Case Crime No. 893 of 2004 under section 364-A. I. P. C. , P. S. Singhani gate, District Ghaziabad.

( 2 ) IN this case, time of four weeks was granted to learned A. G. A. to file a counter affidavit and notice was issued to opposite party No. 2 Sri Vimal Kumar Saini to file a counter affidavit within the same period. The office report dated 23-12-2005 and the report dated 12-9-2005 sent by the learned chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad shows that the notice sent to opposite party No. 2 has been served on him but neither opposite party No. 2 nor on his behalf any counsel has appeared before this Court and learned A. G. A. has also not filed any counter affidavit.

( 3 ) THE facts, in brief giving rise to this revision, are that the F. I. R. was lodged by opposite party No. 2 Sri Vimal Kumar Sai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document