R.K.RASTOGI
MOHAN MAHALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
( 2 ) I have heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A. G. A. for the State.
( 3 ) THE learned A. G. A. states that he has not received instructions in this case. I have perused the record. It appears that on 5/3/2005 a report was lodged by Shiv Mohan patel O. P. No. 2 against the applicants and their son Shanker Mahali under Sections 363/366, I. P. C. at Police Station, Lanka, varanasi for kidnapping of their minor daughter Anita aged about 15 years on 1/1/2005. It was further alleged that both the parties were neighbours and so informant was asking the abovenamed accused persons to return his daughter back and when, they did not do so, he lodged this report on 5-3-2005.
( 4 ) IT appears that after investigation a charge-sheet was submitted against the present accused applicants under Sections 363/366, I. P. C. and then this application under Section 482, Cr. P. C. has been moved for quashing of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.