VINOD PRASAD
KUNWAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 2 ) THE revisionist complainant Kunwar singh is aggrieved by an order dated 30-10-2006 passed by 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Etwah in Criminal Case No. 106 of 2006, Kunwar Singh v. Ram Sewak and others, under Section 155 (2), Cr. P. C.
( 3 ) IN short, the allegations of the revisionist Kunwar singh were that on 5-6-2006 opposite party Ram Sewak, his son Arvind, his brother Ram Das and Bhoop Singh brother Of Arvind belaboured his father Ram naresh at 4. 00 p. m. on his roof. Medical examination of Ram Naresh was got done on 5-6-2006 at 6. 55 p. m. , and his medical report indicated two lacerated wounds, which were sustained by the injured. The x-ray report dated 6-6-2006 of the injured indicated that there was a fracture of his right parietal bone of skull. The F. I. R. lodged by the revisionist complainant on 5-6-2006 at 5. 05 p. m. at police station Ekdil regarding the said incident was registered as NCR. Since the F. I. R. was registered as a N. C. R. and there was a grievous injury sustained by the injured, therefore, the revisionist filed an application under Section 155 (2), Cr. P. C. in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.