SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 334

ASHOK BHUSHAN
PUSHPA, POOJA, BHAWNA, SHIV KUMAR GAUTAM, BAL KISHAN GAUTAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.T.KULSHRESTHA, S.R.Verma, V.K.Goel

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri A. T. Kulshrestha, learned counsel for the petitioner and sri V. K. Goel and Sri S. R. Verma appearing for the respondents.

( 2 ) BY this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 27. 11. 2004 passed by the District Judge, Mathura allowing the civil Revision filed by respondent No. 3 against the order dated 7. 5. 2004 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)allowing an application filed by the petitioner under Section 24 of the hindu Marriage Act for interim mandamus and litigation expenses. A petition for divorce has been filed by the respondent No. 3 against the petitioner which is registered as Marriage Petition No. 653 of 2002 shiv Kumar Gautam v. Smt. Puja. The petitioner Smt. Puja filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for the grant of interim maintenance and expenses for litigation. Learned Additional civil Judge (Senior Division) by an order dated 7. 5. 2004 allowed the application of the petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage act and directed for for payment of maintenance at the rate of Rs. 2200/- per month and Rs. 5000/- as litigation expenses and Rs. 150/as exp

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top