SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 448

RAVINDRA SINGH
KEHARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.M.Srivastava, M.C.Chaturvedi, S.C.DWIVEDI

( 1 ) HEARD Sri M. C. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned a. G. A. and Sri H. M. Srivastava learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) THIS writ petition has been filed against the order dated 12-3-2001 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kalpi district Jalaun in Criminal Case No. 00 of 2000, whereby the application filed by the respondent No. 2 was allowed and recalled the order dated 22-8-2000, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Kalpi, dismissing the applications filed by respondent No. 2 under Section 125 Cr. P. C. in her non-appearance and the case was restored to its original number at the cost of Rs. 100/- and order dated 22-6-2001, passed by learned iii Addl. Sessions Judge, Jalaun at Orai in criminal Revision No. 105 of 2001, whereby the revision filed by the petitioner against the abovementioned order dated 12-3-2001 was dismissed.

( 3 ) THE facts, in brief, of this case are that the respondent No. 2 Smt. Rekha Singh filed an application dated 28-11-1997 claiming the maintenance allowance from her husband, the petitioner Kehari Singh under Section 125 Cr. P. C. , in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Orai, District jalaun. The res















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top