SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 534

KRISHNA MURARI
HABIB SHEIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vipin Sinha, Yogendra Sahai Saxena

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Y, S. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri vipin Sinha for the respondent No. 3.

( 2 ) PROCEEDINGS Initiated by the respondent No. 3-bank for recovery of loan amount was challenged by the petitioner by filing a writ petition No. 30063 of 2004. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 2-8-2004 with the following directions; (i) Petitioner will deposit the entire amount so payable upto 31st July, 2004 within a period of one month from today in the respondent bank. (ii) After aforesaid deposit petitioner further undertakes to pay regular instalments as and when they become due in accordance with the bank schedule. (iii) In the event deposits are made in the manner as indicated above, respondents will not proceed to recover any amount from the petitioner by taking any coercive process. (iv) In the event the amount is deposited as indicated above, respondent bank will not take any recovery charge. (v) Tractor of the petitioner, if under attachment shall be released on deposit of the defaulted amount if any, payable up to 31st july, 2004.

( 3 ) IT has been stated in paragraph Nos. 4 and 5 of the writ petition that in pursuance of
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top