( 1 ) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent-State government in respect of the grant of mining lease to the respondent No. 3 over plot no. 29/3, Area 30 Acres, Buksha Khadar, tehsil Mahauda, District-Hamirpur, by the impugned order dated 2-4-2004 and the consequential lease dated 5-4-2004. The petitioner contends that the right of the petitioner to apply for the aforesaid area has been arbitrarily taken away by the respondents by not resorting to publication of any notice making the land available to the public at large and, as such, the petitioner and such alike persons have been denied their right to participate in the proceedings for grant of mining lease. The order has been challenged on the aforesaid grounds and also that none of the ingredients of Rule 68 of the Minor Minerals Concession Rules 1963 exist so as to warrant exercise of power therein by the State Government in favour of the respondent No. 3 whose earlier lease had been cancelled and facts with regard to which have been set out in detail in the report of the District Magistrate dated 28-2-2004. The petitioner has further urged that in the event the order dated 2-4-2004 is set aside, the writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document