SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1742

B.B.AGARWAL, M.C.JAIN
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
DHAKAN – Respondent


M. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) SIX accused respondents, namely, Dhakan, Bechey Lal, jagdlsh, Bahoran, Omkar and Ulfat were tried before VI Additional Sessions Judge, bareilly for the offence of rioting, attempt to murder and voluntarily causing hurt to three persons, namely, Karan Singh, Sipattar singh and Dharmapal Singh. They came to be acquitted by judgment dated 29-9-1980 impugned in this appeal from the side of the state. Out of them, Dhakan and Ulfat died during the pendency of appeal and the same abated under order dated 28-11-2003. Jagdish and Bechey Lai are the sons of dhakan whereas Bahoran ad Omkar are his nephews and Ulfat is his cousin brother.

( 2 ) WE have heard Miss Usha Kiran, learned A. G. A. from the side of the State and sri Surendra Pal Singh for the accused bechey Lal, Bahoran and Omkar, Jagdish absconded and Sri R. C. Upadhyaya was appointed amicus curiae for him under order dated 7-7-2005. Sri Upadhyaya has been heard for him.

( 3 ) THE prosecution case, in broad essentials, was that the injured and accused were the residents of the same village. The injured Karan Singh PW-1 had purchased some land from Pati Ram (brother of accused dhakan) prior to the presence occurr















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top