SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1922

S.U.KHAN
HART SARAN SHANKER SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, GHAZIPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.G.SRIVASTAV, K.S.CHAUHAN

( 1 ) THE only point involved in this writ petition is regarding interpretation of a will executed by Late Laxmi Narain srivastava on 27-2-1970.

( 2 ) DURING consolidation proceedings petitioner filed objections under Section 12 of u. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act before the consolidation Officer, Ghazipur stating therein that the agricultural land situate in ghazipur, which earlier belonged to Laxmi narain Srivastava, should be recorded in favour of petitioner-applicant on the basis of the aforesaid Will.

( 3 ) RESPONDENTS 4 and 5 contested the proceedings and contended that even if the alleged Will was executed by Laxmi Narain srivastava, it was confined to his agricultural land and the other immovable property situate in district Nainital. The Consolidation officer, Ghazipur found that the Will appeared to have been executed. However, it held that the Will related to the immovable property of the testator which were situate in district Nainital and not to the agricultural land of the testator, which was situate in district Ghazipur. The Consolidation officer, therefore, rejected the objection of the petitioner and directed the recording of the name of the contesting responden









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top