SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 247

SUNIL AMBWANI
HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
APPELLATE AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, KANPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.B.Singh, Sanjay Mishra

SUNIL AMBWANI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Sanjay Misra for petitioner. No one appears for respondents. The petitioner is challenging the orders passed by Controlling authority and the Appellate Authority under payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, by which the petitioner had been directed to pay the entire amount of gratuity of Rs. 23,190/- along with cost of the case assessed as Rs. 100/- within 30 davs.

( 2 ) THE claimant-respondent No. 3 was engaged as workman by the petitioner company on December 8, 1965. After a domestic enquiry, he was dismissed from service on April 2, 1986 for an act of misbehaviour. The workman raised an industrial dispute which was referred and adjudicated as Industrial Dispute No. 61 of 1987 and was decided against him on February 24, 1989. A writ petition No. Nil of 1989 filed by the workman against the award was dismissed on November 1, 1989. The workman requested the company for payment of gratuity, and thereafter filed an application before the controlling Authority under Payment of gratuity Act, 1972. The Controlling Authority found that no evidence has been led to show that the workman was guilty of any such acts of disorderly or riotous behaviour which may have









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top