IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S. K. AGARWAL, ONKARESHWAR BHATT
PREETAM - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 577 Of 1981
Decided On : 03/23/2004
Private Defence - Criminal Law - S. 302, S. 149, S. 307, S. 323 - The judgment discusses the exercise of the right of private defence by the accused in a case involving assault and deaths. The court acquitted the accused of the charges under Ss. 302/149, 307/149, and 307, I. P. C. simpliciter, and Ss. 323/149, I. P. C.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over grazing cattle in a field, leading to a quarrel and subsequent assault by the accused on the victims, resulting in deaths and injuries. The prosecution witnesses provided conflicting testimonies, and the genesis of the incident was shrouded in mystery.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the origin of the incident and the involvement of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. It noted discrepancies in the testimonies of the witnesses and the delayed filing of the report, leading to doubts about the authenticity of the prosecution's version.
Issues: The main issues included the authenticity of the prosecution's version, the reliability of the witnesses' testimonies, and the exercise of the right of private defence by the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the accused had exercised their right of private defence against the deceased persons and others, and acquitted them of the charges. It emphasized the need to discern individual roles and offenses in cases of exceeding the right of private defence.
Final Decision: The court acquitted the accused of the charges under Ss. 302/149, 307/149, and 307, I. P. C. simpliciter, and Ss. 323/149, I. P. C. The appeal was allowed, and the bail bonds of all the appellants were cancelled.
( 1 ) THIS appeal was preferred by these five accused-appellants against their conviction under S. 302 read with S. 149, I. P. C. and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life. Further accused-appellants. Preetam and Mukundi were convicted and sentenced to 7 years R. I. under s. 307, I. P. C. simpliciter, 2 years R. I. to accused-appellants karan Singh, Tutti and katti under S. 307 read with S. 149, I. P. C. , 6 months R. I. to accused-appellants-preetam, Karan Singh, Mukundi, Katti and tutti under S. 323 read with S. 149, I. P. C. However, all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that on 20-8-1977 at about 3. 30 p. m. when Gulab son of Pooran and his nephew Chhatrapal son of Bahadur were grazing their cattle in dhandhai Haar. appellant-Preetam, who is a collateral of the above two, came there and asked Chhatrapal and Gulab, why they are grazing their cattle in his field. Chhatrapal and Gulab told him that they did not graze their cattle in his field. Preetam abused and belaboured them. Gulab and Chhatrapal are said to have defended themselves and also assaulted Preetam. On an alarm raised by preetam his family men who were working in the vicinity including the four appellants rushed to the spot of incident. Three of them, preetam, Karan Singh and Mukundi, were armed with axes and two were armed with lathis. On seeing the appellants-Gulab and chhatrapal ran towards their home to es-cape any further assault. The appellants followed them and when Gulab and chhatrapal reached the field of Hirwa, they were assaulted by Preetam, Mukundi and karan Singh and seven other accused per-sons with axes and Lathis. Hearing the alarm the informant and his brother bahadur, rushed to save their children. They were ploughing their fields nearby. They were also belaboured. Some other witnesses also arrived at the spot of occurrence on hearing the alarm raised by Pooran and bahadur. They include his daughter Lachchi and Sunkiya, wife of his brother Bahadur. The accused, after assaulting the four, ran away towards the village, Gulab and his nephew Chhatrapal were lying dead in a pool of blood in the field of Hirwa. They too suffered axe and Lathi injuries. Due to rain and fear of the accused persons they did not go to the police station that day. The report in the case was lodged on 21-8-1977 at 8. 30 a. m. The distance between the police station and the place of occurrence is just 5 miles.
( 3 ) ON the side of prosecution, apart from the two deceased, Chhatrapal and Gulab punna suffered only blunt object injuries. Bahadur had an incised wound 2 cm. x. 5 cm. x muscle deep at the border of the right mandibular angle 4 cm. below right ear. Rest of his injuries were by blunt object.
( 4 ) THESE injured were medically examined by P. W. 6 Dr. R. S. Mishra on 21-8-1977 between 10. 30 and 11. 30 a. m. He has proved their injury reports. A perusal of his statement indicates that none of the injuries were found grievous, no X-ray report nor any supplementary medical report is available on the record. In these circumstances, their injuries, apparently, were simple. The colour of contusions was not noted by this doctor. The duration of their injuries was twenty hours. It is an important aspect.
( 5 ) THE post-mortem examination on the body of the two deceased-Gulab and chatrapal, was conducted by P. W. 8 Dr. V. D. Mishra. He found three incised wounds on the body of Chhatrapal, two of them being on the head, one covered right side face, lower part of the right ear and part of neck and the other on the left side of head 12 cm. above the left ear. In both the injuries underlying bones were cut. The third injury was on the buttock. In the opinion of the Doctor, cause of death was shock and haemorrhage as a result of injurie Nos. 1 and 2.
( 6 ) THE post-mortem examination on the body of deceased-Gulab took place at 2. 45 p. m. on 22-8-1977 and was conducted by p. W. 8, Dr. V. D. Mishra. In the c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.