SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 586

O.BHATT, S.K.AGARWAL
PREETAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.CHOUDHURY, GOPAL SINGH, KAMLESHVAR SINGH, R.S.TIVARI

S. K. AGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal was preferred by these five accused-appellants against their conviction under S. 302 read with S. 149, I. P. C. and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life. Further accused-appellants. Preetam and Mukundi were convicted and sentenced to 7 years R. I. under s. 307, I. P. C. simpliciter, 2 years R. I. to accused-appellants karan Singh, Tutti and katti under S. 307 read with S. 149, I. P. C. , 6 months R. I. to accused-appellants-preetam, Karan Singh, Mukundi, Katti and tutti under S. 323 read with S. 149, I. P. C. However, all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that on 20-8-1977 at about 3. 30 p. m. when Gulab son of Pooran and his nephew Chhatrapal son of Bahadur were grazing their cattle in dhandhai Haar. appellant-Preetam, who is a collateral of the above two, came there and asked Chhatrapal and Gulab, why they are grazing their cattle in his field. Chhatrapal and Gulab told him that they did not graze their cattle in his field. Preetam abused and belaboured them. Gulab and Chhatrapal are said to have defended themselves and also assaulted Preetam. On an alarm raised by preetam his family men






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top