SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1087

SUNIL AMBWANI
CHARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.Pandey, S.P.S.Rathore

SUNIL AMBWANI, J.


( 1 ) HEARD S/sri R, K. Tripathi, s. P. S. Rathore B. N. Pandey for petitioners and learned standing counsel. This matter has been placed before me in vacations under the Rules of the Court, after nomination by senior Vacation Judge dated 24-6-2004.

( 2 ) IN Writ Petition No. 23232 of 2004, the petitioners 1 and 4 have passed vaidya visharad Examination of Hindi Sahitya sammelan, Prayag, in the year 1977, and have thereafter worked as Pharmacists at indian Ordinance Factories at Muradnagar, after getting themselves registered with the state Council Ayurvedic Evam Unani Medicine Bihar Patna, and Haryana and Punjab ayurvedic and Unani Chikitsa Parishad board, Shimla respectively. The petitioner no. 2 has passed Vaidya Visharad Examination in the year 1996 and is enrolled with rajkiya Ayurvedic and Chikitsa Parishad. Bihar, on 5-4-1996, and that the petitioner no. 3 has passed H. M. B. S. Examination (Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and surgery) and is registered with Sathi Homeo medical College, Laharia Sarai (Bihar) dated 25-7-1983. All the petitioners claimed to be trained, qualified and registered medical practitioners in Indian Medicine and after having changed



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top