IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
K. N. OJHA
AMAR NATH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. - Respondents
Crl. Appeal 2899 Of 1998
Decided On : 11/04/2004
criminal - appeal - Sections 363, 376, I. P. C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: Sections 363, 376, I. P. C. - The court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Sections 363 and 376, I. P. C. and imposed sentences of three years and 10 years respectively. The court also reduced the fine to Rs. 1,000 and ordered both sentences to run concurrently.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted under Sections 363 and 376, I. P. C. for kidnapping and raping a four-year-old girl. The prosecution presented evidence including eyewitness testimony and medical examination reports to prove the appellant's guilt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant guilty of kidnapping and raping the girl based on the testimony of eyewitnesses and medical evidence. The court also confirmed the appellant's conviction and imposed concurrent sentences of three years and 10 years, with a reduced fine of Rs. 1,000.
Issues: The main issue was the appellant's involvement in the kidnapping and rape of the four-year-old girl, which was supported by eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the eyewitness testimony, medical examination reports, and the provisions of Section 376, I. P. C. to establish the appellant's guilt and impose appropriate sentences.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, confirmed the appellant's conviction under Sections 363 and 376, I. P. C., and imposed concurrent sentences of three years and 10 years, with a reduced fine of Rs. 1,000.
( 2 ) HEARD Shri J. N. Rai, learned Amicus curiae and learned AGA have gone through the record.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to prosecution, Amir Uddin, resident of 15/134, Bari Hathai, Nai Ki mandi, P. S. Nai Ki Mandi, District Agra lodged First Information Report against appellant-Amarnath on 19th May, 1997 at about 11. 50 a. m. under Sections 363 and 376, I. P. C. contending the fact that he along with his grand-daughter were sleeping in mohalla Bari Hathai, Nai Ki Mandi, District agra and when he got up in the morning, he found his grand-daughter missing from the cot. He accompanied with his son Nisar-father of the girl, Aleemuddin, Nawabuddin started to make search. When they were going beside Railway line near Edhgah Indian Railway Depot, they heard shrieks of the girl and found that the appellant was indulged in sexual intercourse with the girl. The informant and other persons caught hold of the appellant at about 10 a. m. on 19-5-97 and carried him and lodged him at the Police Station, F. I. R. was lodged.
( 4 ) THE Investigating Officer took bloodstained underwear of the girl and underwear and shirt of the appellant and prepared its recovery memo. The girl was medically examined by Dr. Smt. Sudharani Agarwal in woman Hospital, Agra on 19th May, 1997 at 5. 30 p. m. An abrasion of about 1. cm x 1 cm. on the face below the right eye was found.
( 5 ) INTERNAL examination was done under anesthesia in O. T. under supervision of Chief medical Superintendent, Women Hospital, agra. There was a tear of about 1 cm. x 1 mm. on both sides of Labia majora and Labia minora fresh tear was present. There was bleeding on touch. There was perineal tear at 6 o clock position standing up to anus. There was vaginal tear about 4 cm. at 6 o clock position. Lateral vaginal tear was present on right side of about 4 cm. in length and 5 mm. in depth. Bleeding was present on touch. Vaginal smear was taken and sent to Pathologist, District Hospital, Agra. The prosecutrix was referred to surgery department. S. N. Medical College at Hospital, Agra for further management and treatment. The weight of the girl was 12 kg. In the opinion, she was aged about four years and injury was caused by blunt object within 24 hours.
( 6 ) AFTER recording statement of witnesses under Section 161, Cr. P. C. and getting the girl medically examined,completing the investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against the appellant under Sections 363 and 376, I. P. C.
( 7 ) THE accused denied his participation in the crime and alleged that he was not arrested from the spot of alleged occurrence. It was also alleged that he was falsely involved in the crime.
( 8 ) PROSECUTION examined P. W. 1 Amir uddin-informant and grandfather of the girl. P. W. 2 Nisar Uddin-father of the girl, P. W. 3-the girl herself, P. W. 4 Constable Clerk ram Gopal and prepared Chick Report No. 46 dated 20-5-97 at Crime No. 87/97 under Section 363 and 376, i. P. C. The prosecution also examined P. W. 5-Constable ranvir Singh who on the basis of the report of Amir Uddin. prepared Chik Report, P. W. 6 S. I. Satyavir Singh, P. W. 7 Rajpal Singh made investigation in the case who submitted charge-sheet. P. W. 8 Dr. Smt. Sudharani agarwal was also examined who proved medical examination report.
( 9 ) THE accused did not examine any witness in d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.