SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 78

ANJANI KUMAR
U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
P. O. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (1) ALLAHABAD – Respondent


ANJANI KUMAR, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioners-employers-U. P. State electricity Board, by means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, have challenged the award of the industrial Tribunal (1 ). U. P. , at Allahabad, hereinafter referred to as the tribunal, dated 9/08/1985, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of present writ petition are that the contesting respondent-workman, namely, Mohd. Jameel was employed with the employers, as would be clear from the narration of fact and the written statement filed by the parties and referred to by the Tribunal in the award, which reveals that the workman concerned Mohd. Jameel was employed as Pump Operator-cum- electrician with the employers w. e. f. 1/06/1977. The services of the workman concerned were wrongfully terminated by the employers on 1/02/1979. The workman through the respective union raised an industrial dispute, which was referred to the Industrial Tribunal, allahabad and was registered by the Tribunal as Adjudication Case No. 168 of 1980. The tribunal vide its award dated 17/08/1981, published on 3/10/1981 held that the) termination o







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top