SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 61

ANJANI KUMAR
KWALITY MOTERS AND COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C.Gharana, S.S.Nigam

ANJANI KUMAR, J.


( 1 ) BY means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-employers challenge the order/recovery certificate dated 17. 5. 1999, passed by Dy. Labour Commissioner, Meerut under the provision of U. P. Industrial Peace (Timely Payment of wages) Act, 1978 hereinafter referred to as the act of 1978, a copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of present writ petition are that petitioner was served with a notice dated 3. 2. 1999 (Annexure-2 to the petition) to show cause as to why recovery under section 3 of the aforesaid Act of 1978 (U. P. Act No. 5 of 1978) be not issued as the employers have not paid a sum of Rs. 95,785 = 26 with regard to the lay-off compensation of their 12 workmen between the period October, 1998 to December, 1998. The employers submitted their reply that the provisions of Section 3 of the aforesaid Act of 1978 are not attracted as the amount of lay-off compensation cannot be said to be covered within the meaning of wages under the payment of Wages Act; and that the employees are less than 20 in number, therefore, the Dy. Labour Commissioner has n









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top