SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 164

N.K.MEHROTRA
RAJA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.CHAUBE

N. K. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the impugned order of termination dated 13. 10. 1986, passed by the opposite party No. 3 Executive engineer, Minor Irrigation Division-I, Lucknow and for mandamus to hold the provisions of rule 4 read with Rule 9 and Rule 8 of the U. P. Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (On posts Outside the Purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, as ultra vires and further a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to continue in service without interruption and also to regularise the services of the petitioner in accordance with Regularisation Rules and give him full consequential benefits.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, he was given appointment on the post of gotakhor by the opposite party No. 3 vide order dated 7. 5. 1983 (Annexure-1 ). He joined the post of "gotakhor" on 7. 5. 1983 and since then, he has been performing his duties without any complaint. His services were terminated vide order dated 13. 10. 1986 (Annexure-2) in accordance with the instructions contained in the U. P. Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (On Pos

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top