SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 143

U.S.TRIPATHI
DAYAWATI – Appellant
Versus
MADAN LAL VARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Mandhyan, N.C.Tripathi, S.K.VERMA, S.S.Nigam, Satish Mandhyan, SIDDHARTH AGGARWAL

U. S. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal has been filed against judgment and decree dated 25-9-1998 in Civil Appeal No. 523 of 1986 allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit of appellants.

( 2 ) THE present appellants filed the suit No. 109 of 1985 for the relief of declaration that the sale deed executed by Nava Ratan Lal regarding the disputed house No. 473-A, Shahganj, Allahabad in favour of Ghasi Ram Chaurasiya, respondent No. 3 and subsequent sale deeds executed by Ghasi Ram in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 are void and not binding upon the appellants.

( 3 ) IN brief, the appellants pleaded in the plaint that the house in dispute was acquired by Sri Parmeshwar Dayal grand father of Nava Ratan Lal and it was ancestral property in the hands of Nava Ratan Lal, who was defendant No. 1 to suit, but died during the pendency of the suit in the year 1997 and therefore was not impleaded as party in this appeal. The appellants are widow, sons and daughters of Nava Ratan Lal. It was further alleged in the plaint that the sale deed was obtained by fraud from Nava Ratan Lal. It was obtained without consideration. That in fact there was only loan transaction, but the sale deed was






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top