SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 249

S.P.SRIVASTAVA, ASHOK BHUSHAN
MOTI LAL – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.GUPTA, R.N.UPADHAYA, RANVIJAI SINGH, S.K.MISHRA

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri R. N. Upadliaya, the learned Counsel for the appellant as well as the learned standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

( 2 ) BY this special appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 19. 12. 2002 passed in Writ Petition No. 54394 of 2002 (Moti Lal v. District Magistrate, lalitpur and Ors.) dismissing the writ petition.

( 3 ) BRIEF facts giving rise to this appeal are; the appellant is an elected Pradhan of Gram panchayat Kalyanapura, Block Virdha, Tahsil and District Lalitpur. Up- Pradhan made a complaint against the appellant. On the complaint a preliminary enquiry was directed. The complaint was signed by several other villagers along with Mangal Singh, Up-Pradhan. An affidavit was also filed by Mangal Singh sworn by Oath Commissioner, Land Conservation officer and Project Officer conducted preliminary enquiry and submitted preliminary enquiry report dated 13. 10. 2002. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant by the District magistrate dated 25. 10. 2002. The appellant submitted a reply to the show cause notice. The district Magistrate passed two orders on 27. 11. 2002 filed as Annexures-6 and





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top