SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 246

B.K.RATHI
P. K. TOMAR – Appellant
Versus
ARCHANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT SAXENA, D.N.VALI, MAHESH CHANDRA GUPTA, TRIPATI, VIJAY PRAKASH

R. P. MISHRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 95 of the CPC against the judgment and order dated 7-2-2002 passed by District Judge, Ghaziabad by which he allowed the petition of the respondent and decreed the petition for dissolution of marriage by the decree of divorce.

( 2 ) THE respondent who is resident of C-538 Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi filed the petition against the appellant alleging that the appellant is resident of 453/5 Brahmapuri, Meerut and is in service as social worker in L. L. R. Medical College, Meerut. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 13-12-1996 at Meerut according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. That at the time of the marriage it was agreed that the appellant will resign from the job at Meerut and join the company of the respondent at Delhi and discharge her marital obligations. However the appellant did not resign from the job as agreed and on the other hand her behaviour became intolerable and cruel. She several times humiliated the respondent and his parents saying that they are persons of low standard and did not know as to how to live in style. The appellant refused to stay with the respondent and also to resign from the job and ther































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top