SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 488

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
V. M. Sahai and Mukteshwar Prasad, JJ.
TITU SINGH - Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/collector - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition 28626 Of 1997
Decided On : 03/06/2003

Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK SRIVASTAVA, C.P.MISHRA, M.K.RAJVANSHI, N.C.RAJVANSHI, VINAY MISHRA, VIRENDRA KUMAR, VIVEK MISHRA

Only taxes imposed under the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, and Town Areas Act can be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

Headnote:

tax - recovery of arrears of land revenue - U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, Section 173-A, Town Areas Act, Section 21

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner participated in an auction for collecting parking fee but the contract was cancelled by the respondents without giving an opportunity of hearing. The respondents issued a recovery certificate to realize the amount as arrears of land revenue.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the amount in question could not be recovered as arrears of land revenue based on the provisions of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, Section 173-A, and Town Areas Act, Section 21, as it was not a tax imposed under these Acts.

Issues: The issue was whether the amount due from the petitioner could be recovered as arrears of land revenue under the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, and Town Areas Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that only taxes imposed under the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, and Town Areas Act could be recovered as arrears of land revenue, and since the amount in question was not a tax imposed under these Acts, it could not be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

Final Decision: The petition succeeded, and the recovery certificate/citation issued by respondent No. 3 was quashed. The respondents were allowed to recover the amount in question from the petitioner in accordance with the law.

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) WE have heard Sri Ashok Srivastava, holding brief of Sri M. K. Rajvanshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Mishra, and Sri C. P. Mishra learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

( 2 ) BY means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the recovery certificate/citation dated 12. 5. 1997, issued by respondent No. 3 (Anncxure 6 to the writ petition) and for a direction to the respondents No. 1 and 2 not to proceed against the person and property of the petitioner on the basis of recovery certificate/citation dated 12. 5. 1997. The petitioner participated in an auction for collecting parking fee conducted by Nagar Panchayat Raya, District Mathura, for the year 1996-97 and Sri titu Singh (the petitioner) was the higher bidder, the bid being Rs. 20,06,000/ -. An agreement was executed between the parties. The petitioner deposited a sum of Rs. 10,37,000/- upto 15th october, 1996. The respondent No. 3 sent a notice dated 18. 12. 1996 asking the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 9,69,000/- The petitioner made a representation to the respondent No. 3 and prayed for permission to complete the tenure of the Theka and in due course of time promised to deposit the balance of Theka money. However, the respondents cancelled the contract on 31. 12. 1996, without giving an opportunity of hearing to him. The respondent re-auctioned collection of parking fee and petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 6,59,000/- within a week. Ultimately, the respondent No. 3, issued a recovery certificate/citation to respondent No. 1, to realise the aforesaid amount as arrears of land revenue.

( 3 ) A counter-affidavit was filed by respondents No. 3 and 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has urged that the balance of the Theka money and the loss suffered by respondent No. 3 to the tune of Rs. 6,59,000/- is not a tax as mentioned in Section 173-A of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, and as such the same is not recoverable as arrears of land revenue. Therefore, the respondent No. 3 was not justified in sending the recovery certificate/citation to respondent No. 1 for recovery of aforesaid amount as arrears of land revenue. Reliance was placed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner on two Division Bench decisions of this Court in ram Bilas Tibriwal v. Chairman, Municipal Board, Titri Bazar and Ors. , 1998 (2) A. W. C. 1468; rai Bahadur Singh v. Collector, Etawah-cum-District Magistrate, Etawah and Anr. , 1986 All LJ 956 and on a decision in Mumtaz Ali v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Anr. , 1970 R. D. 83.

( 4 ) SECTION 173-A of the Municipalities Act reads as under :

"173-A. Recovery of taxes as arrears to land revenue.- (1) Where any sum is due on account of a tax, other than octroi or toll or any similar tax payable upon immediate demand, from a person to a board, the board may, without prejudice to any other mode of recover, apply to the Collector to recover such sum together with costs of the proceedings as if it were an arrear of land revenue. (2) The Collector on being satisfied that the sum is due shall proceed to recover it as an arrears of land revenue. "

( 5 ) SECTION 21 of the Town Areas Act is an as below on the subject:

"21. Recovery of arrears.-Arrears of any tax imposed under this Act may be recovered on the expiry of three weeks from the date of the issue of writ of demand, on application to a Magistrate having jurisdiction within the limits of the town area or in any other place within (Uttar Pradesh)where the defaulter may for the time being reside, by the attachment and sale of any movable (or immovable) property belonging to such defaulter and within limits of such Magistrates jurisdiction. "

( 6 ) FROM perusal of the aforesaid provisions of the Municipalities Act and Town Area Act, it is clear that the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is well founded. Under Section 173-A of the Municipalities






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top