RAJES KUMAR
HEERA ELECTRODES – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision filed by the applicant under Section 11 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 against the order of Tribunal dated March 8, 1991 relating to assessment year 1984-85.
( 2 ) THE applicant was a manufacturer of electrode, welding-rods and was also a trader of scrap, iron and steel rods. During the year under consideration, the applicant had entered into a contract on February 28, 1984 with M/s. Gunkar Electrodes Pvt. Ltd. , Rampur, for design, manufacture, fabricate and installation of complete machinery and equipment of electrodes plant for Rs. 5,15,000. The claim of the applicant was that the nature of works was works contract and not sale and therefore, the amount received for execution of such contract was not liable to tax. Assessing authority had not accepted the claim of the applicant and treated the agreement as contract for sale and not works contract and accordingly levied tax on the amount of Rs. 5,15,000. Aggrieved by the order of assessing authority, applicant filed appeal before the assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax, Moradabad, which was rejected. Claim of the dealer of works contract was also rejected by Tribunal. Being aggr
State of Rajasthan v. Man Industrial Corporation Ltd.
Sentinel Rolling Shutters and Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Ram Singh and Sons Engineering Works v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P.
REFERRED TO : Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh v. Purshottam Premji
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.