SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 621

R.C.DEEPAK
TULSI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.SINGH, H.NABAKUMAR SINGH

R. C. DEEPAK, J.

( 1 ) THE present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionists tulsi S/o Raj Kishor and Vijay Singh S/o prasiddha Narain R/o Village Adhanpur, police Station Nevadhiya, District Jaunpur against the order dated 7-3-2003 passed by the then Additional District and Sessions judge/fast Track Court IInd, Jaunpur in sessions Trial No. 320 of 2001, summoning them under Section 319, Cr. P. C. to stand trial for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 323, 324 and 506, IPC.

( 2 ) THE abovenamed revisionists have filed a copy of First Information Report in the Case Crime No. 97 of 1999, statements of Girja Shanker Singh, Smt. Ram Rati, Smt. Meera Devi, report of the Investigating Officer, copy of the charge-sheet and copy of the application dated 27-2-2003, marked as annexures 1 to 7 respectively, in support of their revision.

( 3 ) A perusal of the First Information report (Annexure 1) shows that the complainant Ashok Kumar Singh S/o Girja shanker Singh R/o Village Adhanpur, P. S. Nevadhiya, District Jaunpur lodged a report with the police station Nevadhiya, Jaunpur mentioning therein that on 25-7-1997 at about 7 am. Tulsi, Vijay Singh (Revi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top