SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 766

K.N.OJHA, S.P.SRIVASTAVA
U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
MADHU SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Avanish Mishra

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the owner appellant.

( 2 ) THE appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, feeling aggrieved by the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Meerut, determining an amount of Rs. 8,92,700 as just compensation to which the dependants of the deceased Subodh kumar Sharma were found entitled to on account of his untimely death having been caused in an accident involving the offending motor vehicle-the bus which was owned and being run by the present appellant.

( 3 ) THE Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, after careful consideration of the evidence and materials brought on record, had come to the conclusion that Subodh Kumar Sharma had died in an accident involving the offending motor vehicle on 27. 4. 1996. The deceased was aged about 39 years at the time of death and was employed as a Senior Teacher in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Air force, Station Hindon, Ghaziabad.

( 4 ) IT may be noticed that the death had occurred in the accident caused by the explosion of bomb in the Bus. The Tribunal drew ample support for its conclusion from the observations made in the case of Samir Chand v. M. D. ,





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top