IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S. K. AGARWAL, V. S. BAJPAI
BANDOO BEDIA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
C. M. H. C. P. 43233 Of 2002
Decided On : 05/09/2003
Detention - Public Order - Criminal Law Amendment Act, National Security Act - Sections 147/148/149/323/353, I. P. C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act - Summary: The court discussed the incident leading to the detention of the petitioner under the National Security Act, emphasizing that the alleged disturbance caused by the assault on the policemen did not disrupt public order. The court found the detention to be based on flimsy and fabricated grounds, and concluded that the incident was a law and order problem, not posing a threat to public order and tranquillity.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was detained under the National Security Act based on an incident involving assault on policemen at a fair organized by the Bedia community. The sponsoring authority alleged that the petitioner's criminal activities had created terror in the society.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the detention to be unjustified, as the incident did not disturb public order and tranquillity. The court criticized the sponsoring authority for fabricating grounds for detention and concluded that the incident was a law and order problem, not posing a threat to public order.
Issues: The main issue was whether the incident leading to the petitioner's detention constituted a disturbance to public order, warranting detention under the National Security Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the incident did not meet the threshold for disturbance of public order and tranquillity, emphasizing that the detention was based on flimsy and fabricated grounds.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitions and ordered the release of the petitioners who were under detention.
( 1 ) THERE are eight writ petitions connected with each other. Civil Misc. Habeas Corpus Writ Petion No. 43233 of 2002, therefore, is treated as principal case. It was preferred by Bandoo Bedia son of Ralli Bedia. Other petitioners are Bhagoni alias Bhagwan alias Bhagwan Das alias Bhagone, Raghav Bedia, Pappu Bedia, Gabbar Bedia, Vijay Bedia, Raj Pal Bedia and Kullu Bedia.
( 2 ) AN F. I. R. was registered as case Crime No. 135 of 2002 against the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 43233 of 2002 and nine others under Sections 147/148/149/323/353, I. P. C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act at P. S. Madawara, District Lalitpur.
( 3 ) THE facts of the F. I. R. as disclosed in the grounds of detention, are that on 10-6-2002 at about 4. 45 p. m. in a Mela (fair) which was going on in village Rangaon near Moti Mandir, Pappu Bedia, the brother-in-law of the petitioner, was exhibiting unpleasant behaviour towards females. He was asked to desist from his misconduct by three policemen present in the Mela. He did not stop his unlawful activities with the female members present in the fair. Consequently Constable Vimlendra Singh, Karim Khan, and Head Constable Ram Prakash Tewari took him into their custody. When they were proceeding with Pappu Bedia to the police station, the petitioner along with his other companions started belabouring them near a Imli tree with Sariya, Lathi and dandas with an intent to kill the constables. He managed the release of his brother-in-law, Pappu Bedia, who in turn also joined this petitioner in the assault of the constables. Constable Vimlendra Singh sustained injuries on his head and hand. There was disturbance in the fair. People started running helter-skelter. The shopkeepers downed their shutters and started fleeing from the fair premises. The entire fair was completely disturbed. The people living in the vicinity had closed their doors and confined themselves within the four walls of their houses. The public order allegedly was completely disrupted. On the arrival of other police personnel on duty in the fair, the petitioner along with the companions and the released accused Pappu Bedia fled from the spot. Constable Karim Khan lodged the report of this incident, as earlier reported. Case Crime No. 135 of 2002 under the abovesaid sections was registered. It is also alleged in the grounds that the petitioners withdrew from the spot by resorting to firing. The people became so panicky and afraid of the petitioner Pappu Bedia that no body was prepared to state the truth or make any statement in Court, though the policemen had all along been trying to checkmate the growing influence and the terror of this petitioner by their frequent visit of the village. Additional force was also deployed in the region for the above said purpose.
( 4 ) THE Investigating Officer, on his return to the police station on 11-6-2002 from the investigation, had also made some entry in G. D. No. 25 at 8. 20 p. m. to this effect. The petitioner was arrested on 14-6-2002 and remanded to jail thereafter.
( 5 ) A proposal for detention of the petitioner was mooted by S. H. O. Hargovind Verma of P. S. Madawara, District Lalitpur. The report of the Circle Officer attached to this proposal also indicates that this petitioner is a hazardous person and nobody feels himself secure from him in the society. The public does not dare to challenge him, nor they are prepared to make any statement against him either to the police or in the Court. The report of the S. P. submitted along with the proposal of the S. H. O. shows that the petitioner has made an application for his release before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Maharuani, Lalitpur, on 18-6-2002, which was to be heard on that very day in addition to. There are every possibilities of his immediate release. On being released on bail the petitioner, according to these reports, is likely to indulge into his nefarious activities and he may commit some serious offence, which
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.