ASHOK BHUSHAN
UMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri Narendra Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Faujdar Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 to 5. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and as prayed by counsel for both the parties the writ petition is being finally disposed of.
( 2 ) BY means of the this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 1. 4. 2003 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Mirzapur and the order dated 11. 12. 1995 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Ramal Patti, Mirzapur.
( 3 ) BRIEF facts of this case are : "an objection under Section 9a (2) of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act") was filed by the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, petitioner Nos. 6 to 9 and petitioner Nos. 11 and 12 claiming that they are co-tenure holders with regard to land in dispute. In the objection Roop Chandra Varma, Ramesh Chandra Varma, Sharad Chandra Varma and Prakash Chandra Varma were impleaded as defendants and it was claimed that they had only 1/3rd share. A compromise was filed by both the parties and the Consolidation Officer on the basis of the aforesai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.