SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1180

ASHOK BHUSHAN
UMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
FAUJDAR RAI, Narendra Mohan, R.K.Shahi

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.


( 1 ) HEARD Sri Narendra Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Faujdar Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 to 5. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and as prayed by counsel for both the parties the writ petition is being finally disposed of.

( 2 ) BY means of the this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 1. 4. 2003 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Mirzapur and the order dated 11. 12. 1995 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Ramal Patti, Mirzapur.

( 3 ) BRIEF facts of this case are : "an objection under Section 9a (2) of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act") was filed by the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, petitioner Nos. 6 to 9 and petitioner Nos. 11 and 12 claiming that they are co-tenure holders with regard to land in dispute. In the objection Roop Chandra Varma, Ramesh Chandra Varma, Sharad Chandra Varma and Prakash Chandra Varma were impleaded as defendants and it was claimed that they had only 1/3rd share. A compromise was filed by both the parties and the Consolidation Officer on the basis of the aforesai













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top