B.S.CHAUHAN, RAJES KUMAR
ANIMESH JAM – Appellant
Versus
THE HOME SECRETARY V. P. THROUGH STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE writ petition has been filed for seeking a direction to the Home Secretary of the State of Uttar Pradesh to transfer the investigation to the C. B. C. I. D. in Case Crime No. 92 of 2003 under Section 302 I. P. C. relating to Police Station Adarsh Mandi. Muzaffarnagar.
( 2 ) THE present writ petition has been filed on the ground that the petitioner does not expect a fair investigation by the police for the reasons that the Area is dominated by the Jats and they are pressurising the investigating Agency to involve the petitioner. Therefore, the investigation may be transferred to the C. BC. I. D.
( 3 ) THE Learned AG. A has raised preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition as it has been filed impleading only respondent No. 1 i. e. The Home Secretary, U. P. Lucknow, through State of U. P. It has been submitted by him that the State has not been impleaded as a respondent and the writ cannot be entertained against the officer of the State without impleading the State as has been held by the Courts time and again.
( 4 ) IN Ranjeet Mal v. General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi and Anr,1 the Honble Apex Court considered a cas
Referred to : Ranjeet Mal v. General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi and Anr
Kerala State v. General Manager, Southern Railway. Madras
State of Kerala v. General manager, Southern Railway Madras
Pusha Ram v. Modern Construction Co. (P) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.