SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1346

A.K.BANERJI, S.P.SRIVASTAVA
NEELU KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
NAVEEN KOHLI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.M.A.Kazmi, VINOD MISHRA

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the judgment and order of the family Court decreeing the Suit of the husband filed under Section 13 of the Hindu marriage Act and annulling the marriage solemnized between the parties to the suit on 20-11-1975 providing, however, that the decree of annulment of marriage will come into effect on the payment of a lump sum amount of Rs. 5 lacs to the wife towards maintenance allowance to her, the wife has now approached this Court by means of the present First Appeal seeking redress praying for the reversal of the impugned decree.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the wife appellant as well as the learned counsel representing the husband respondent and have carefully perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass.

( 4 ) THE Suit giving rise to this appeal had been filed on 9-1-1997 claiming a decree of divorce and annulment of the marriage praying for "setting the petitioner (husband) at liberty from the marital ties". The husband had come up with the case that he had been married to the defendant-wife on 20-11-1975 out of which wed-lock three















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top