SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1437

U.S.TRIPATHI, D.P.GUPTA
PARMANAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohan Chandra, P.N.GANGVAR, R.S.KUSHVAHA, Satish Trivedi

U. S. TRIPATHI, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal has0 been directed against the judgment and order dated 8-9-1981 passed by the then 1st additional Sessions Judge, Barielly in S. T. No. 79 of 1981 convicting the appellant parmanand under Section 302 1. P. C. and appellant Hari Ram under Section 302 read with Section 341. P. C. and sentencing each of them to undergo imprisonment for life.

( 2 ) THE prosecution story, briefly stated, was as under :kundan Lai (50) deceased resident of village Siraura, P. S. Bhojipura, district Bareilly was real brother of Gendan Lai, the father of appellants Parmanand and Hari Ram. Gendan Lai had another son Hardwari. Kundan Lal had no male issue and had only one daughter named Smt. Nanhi, who was married with Ajudhia (P. W. I), resident of village Ashpur, P. S. Hafizganj, district bareilly, Kundan Lai deceased was living separately from his brother Gendan Lal. Kundan Lai owned about 35 Bighas agricultural land, which was jointly recorded in his name and in the name of Gendan Lal, but each of them had got separated their share by mutual agreement. Kundan Lal had given his land on Batai (crop share basis)since Kundan Lal had no male issue the appellants wanted to

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top