SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1535

ANJANI KUMAR
U. P. RAJYA SAHKARI KRISHI EVAM GRAMYA VIKAS BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR COURT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.R.Mishra, SIDDHARTH

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE employer, a Co-operative Society, registered under the provisions of the U. P. Cooperative Societies Act, has challenged the award of the labour court, Ghaziabad, dated 8th january, 1997 in Adjudication Case No. 19 of 1993.

( 2 ) THE following dispute was referred for adjudication to the labour court : ^^d;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk viuh efgyk Jfed Jherh lq/kkxqirk iruh Jh ,l- ds- xqirk in Dydzandvkbfilv dks fnukad1-1-1989 ls dk;z ls i`fkd@oafpr fd;k tkuk mfpr rfkkos/kkfud gs \ ;fn ughaa rks lecfu/kr efgyk Jfed D;kykhk@vuqrks"k fjyhq ikus dh vf/kdkfj. kh gs rfkk vu; fdl fooj. k lfgr \**

( 3 ) THE parties have exchanged their pleadings and adduced the evidence. The workman concerned has set up the case that she has been working with the employer with effect from 16th november, 1984 till 30th June, 1985 and thereafter from 25th August, 1987 till 31st December, 1988 as Typist and her services were terminated without assigning any reason on 1st January, 1989. No enquiry, whatsoever, has been conducted nor the provisions of retrenchment has been complied with. As against this, the employer have set up the case that the workman concerned was employed with effect from 1









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top