SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2224

RAKESH TIWARI
VINOD KUMAR-II KAILASHI RAM – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, REGIONAL MANAGER, UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SATYA PRAKASH, V.P.Mathur

RAKESH TIWARI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD counsel for the parties and perused the record.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as Driver in U. P. State Road Transport Corporation, Agra region. , Agra in February 1988. A charge sheet dated 4. 10. 1991 was issued to him by the regional Manager, U. P. S. R. T. C, Agra.

(i) For causing a loss of Rs. 50,000/- to the corporation in accident due to his negligent driving, while he was driving Bus No. UAV 9803. AND (ii) Inspite of the fact that tyre pressure in Bus no. U. P. 80/9361 was very low; he drove the bus causing damage to tyres, which burst resulting in injury to the cleaner.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was placed under suspension by order dated 15. 7. 1991 passed by Assistant regional Manager, the order of suspension was revoked during the enquiry proceedings vide order dated 2. /8. /1991. After enquiry the petitioner was dismissed from service by order dated 31. 8. 1992.

( 4 ) AGGRIEVED by dismissal from services the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute under Section 4-K of the U. P. Industrial Dispute Act 1947. On the basis of pleadings of the parties an additional issue was framed by the Labour Court regarding the fairness of. the Domestic enqui













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top