SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2412

M.KATJU, UMESHWAR PANDEY
PRESTIGE PAINTS – Appellant
Versus
CC AND CE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT AWASTHI, B.N.SINGH, BHARATJI AGARWAL, G.R.GUPTA, Pankaj Bhatiya

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Bharatji Agarwal and Sri. Pankaj Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri g. R. Gupta for the respondents,

( 2 ) BY means of this petition, petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondent No. 1, the commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur-Nagar to permit the petitioner to cross examine the witnesses as prayed for by the petitioner in its application dated 21. 7. 2003 and for quashing the order/letter dated 8. 9. 2003, Annexure-6 to the petition.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is propriety concern which carries in the business of manufacture of paints and varnish etc. at Kanpur. The Directorate General, Anti-Evasion conducted various search and seizures in the premises of the petitioner and during this operation, seized certain goods and documents and also recorded statements of various persons. Thereafter, a show cause notice dated 27. 8. 1999 was served on the petitioner as well as several other persons making various allegations with a view to levy Central Excise duty and penalty. The petitioner filed a reply denying the allegation against him. The matter is pending before the respondent No. 1 for adjudication under Section 33 of the Centr








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top