SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2488

S.U.KHAN
KHURSHEEDA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.KUMAR, A.N.Mulla, A.P.SRIVASTAVA

S. U. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is tenants writ petition. Suit of the landlord respondent No. 3 filed against tenants has been decreed by both the courts below inter alia on the ground of default. The main question involved in this writ petition is regarding validity of deposit made by tenant under Section 30 of u. P. Act No. 13 of 1972.

( 2 ) TENANTS instituted Misc. Case No, 137 of 1993 under Section 30 of the Act in which rent from january. 1987 to December, 1993 was deposited on 9. 4. 1993. Thereafter on 25. 1. 1994 rent for the entire year of 1994 was deposited and on 5. 1. 1995 rent of 1995 from January to December was deposited. Thereafter the rent from January, 1996 to December 1996 was deposited on 24. 2. 1996 in the eviction suit giving rise to the instant writ petition instituted before J. S. C. C. , varanasi (Suit No. 113 of 1993 ). The tenant had appeared before J. S. C. C. on 2. 7. 1994. The deposit of rent on 5. 1. 1995 from January, 1995 to December, 1995 under Section 30 after appearing in the suit for eviction cannot be said to be a valid deposit.

( 3 ) THE admitted rate of rent is Rs. 17. 50 per month. The landlord sent notice of termination of tenancy and demand of re







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top