ASHOK BHUSHAN
AHMAD JAMEEL – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD counsel for the parties.
( 2 ) BY the consent of the parties counsels this writ petition is being finally decided at this stage without inviting counter-affidavit.
( 3 ) BY this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 12. 6. 2001, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Moradabad in Case No. 336 of 2001 and the order dated 18. 7. 2003, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Moradabad Division, moradabad, dismissing the Revision No. 62 of 2002-2003 filed by the petitioners under Section 333 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.
( 4 ) PETITIONERS case as mentioned in the writ petition is that they were granted lease by the Gaon sabha in the year 1381f, and since then the petitioners are in possession of the land in dispute. Petitioners further alleged that they are regularly paying the rent and their names are also recorded in the records of rights, Petitioners have further claimed that they have become bhumidhars with non-transferable right. A report was submitted by the Tahsildar, Moradabad to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Moradabad, saying that the names of the petitioners are recorded in cl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.