SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1949

ASHOK BHUSHAN
AHMAD JAMEEL – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUJ KUMAR, J.P.S.Chauhan, S.K.YADAV

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) BY the consent of the parties counsels this writ petition is being finally decided at this stage without inviting counter-affidavit.

( 3 ) BY this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 12. 6. 2001, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Moradabad in Case No. 336 of 2001 and the order dated 18. 7. 2003, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Moradabad Division, moradabad, dismissing the Revision No. 62 of 2002-2003 filed by the petitioners under Section 333 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.

( 4 ) PETITIONERS case as mentioned in the writ petition is that they were granted lease by the Gaon sabha in the year 1381f, and since then the petitioners are in possession of the land in dispute. Petitioners further alleged that they are regularly paying the rent and their names are also recorded in the records of rights, Petitioners have further claimed that they have become bhumidhars with non-transferable right. A report was submitted by the Tahsildar, Moradabad to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Moradabad, saying that the names of the petitioners are recorded in cl
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top