SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1926

PRAKASH KRISHNA
HARI RAM SETH KHANDSARI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Respondent


PRAKASH KRISHNA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions are founded on the common order of the Tribunal dated December 20, 1991 passed in two connected Second Appeals Nos. 329 of 1990 (1979-80) and 330 of 1990 (1980-81 ).

( 2 ) THE applicant is a registered partnership firm and these two revisions relate to the assessment years 1979-80 (U. P.) and 1980-81 (U. P. ). The question involved in these revisions is about the imposition of interest under Section 8 (1) of the U. P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

( 3 ) THE applicant for the assessment year 1978-79 deposited the tax on the turnover of khandsari. The said commodity was taxable at the rate of two per cent. Due to the mistake in the fourth quarter of the assessment year 1978-79 the applicant deposited the tax at the rate of four per cent amounting to Rs. 20,396. 45. The rate of tax being two per cent, it deposited Rs. 10,198. 22 in excess of the amount due under the Sales Tax Act. The mistake was detected by the applicant subsequently and it adjusted the part of the excess amount itself deposited in the third quarter of 1979-80 and the remaining excess amount in the assessment year 1980-81. Applications for adjustment were filed on April 29, 1980 f


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top