B.S.CHAUHAN, D.P.GUPTA
CHHATRAPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned notice dated 3. 9. 2003 (Annexure-4), issued by the respondent No. 2, to convene the meeting for considering no-confidence motion against the petitioner on 22. 9. 2003.
( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that petitioner was elected on 8. 3. 2001, as a Kshettra Pramukh of Block, Hasiyan, District Mahamaya Nagar. Members, more than required for the purpose of the said Kshetra Panchayat gave notice to the District Collector (Respondent No. 2) of no-confidence motion against the petitioner on 30. 6. 2003. The notice was issuing to all the members for holding the meeting on 21. 7. 2003. However, for some reason the meeting was not held and has been scheduled to be held on 22. 9. 2003, which is being challenged on the ground that it was mandatory for the Respondent No. 2 to hold the meeting within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice, i. e. , from 30. 6. 2003, and as the notice has lapsed, the meeting for no-confidence motion cannot be held under the provisions of U. P. Kshettra panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Adhiniyam, 1961
S.K.Singh v. CentralBank of India and Ors.
Debotosh Pal Choudhury v. Punjab National Bank of India and Ors.
Amar Nath Om Prakash and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
C.I.T. v. Sun Engineering Works (P)Ltd.
Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Haryana Financial Corporation and Anr., v. Jagdamba Oil Mills and Anr.
State Bank of Patiala and Ors. v. S.K.Sharma
State of U.P. v. Shatrughan Lal and Anr.
H.H.Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia Bahadur and Ors. v. Union of India
Rajpur Rude Meha v. State of Gujarat
Sarva Shramik Sangh, Bombay v. Indian Hume Pipe Co.Ltd.and Anr.
Jawahar Lal Sazawal and Ors., v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.
Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad
Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh and Ors.
Dhanajaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka etc. etc.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Anjum M.H.Ghaswala and Ors.
Siddappa Vasappa Kuri v.Special Land Acquisition
REFERRED TO : Dadi Jagannadham v. Jammulu Ramulu and Ors.
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad Ors. v. B. Karunakar and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.