SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2617

S.P.SRIVASTAVA, GHANSHYAM DASS
BASDEO SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.D.Misra

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, GHANSHYAM DASS, JJ.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE learned standing counsel representing the respondents on advance notice has also been heard in opposition to the writ petition.

( 3 ) PERUSED the record.

( 4 ) THE petitioner has prayed for a direction requiring the Special Land Acquisition Officer impleaded as respondent No. 2 to rectify, in accordance with the provisions contained in para 94 of the Land Acquisition Manual, exercising the Jurisdiction envisaged under Section 12a of the land Acquisition Act, the award dated 6. 6. 2003 declared under the provisions of the Land acquisition Act determining the amount of compensation in respect of the agricultural holdings of the petitioner which had been acquired under the provisions of the aforesaid Act.

( 5 ) AT the out set it may be noticed that Section 12a of the Land Acquisition Act as applicable to the State of U. P. now stands superseded by the Central Act after the enforcement of the provisions to the identical effect by bringing on the statute book Section 13a providing for correction of clerical error, etc.

( 6 ) THE provisions contained in Section 13a enables the Collector to


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top