SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 22

A.K.YOG
UDAI SINGH BHANUVANSHI – Appellant
Versus
KUNJ BEHARI TEWARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAHUL JAIN, Raj Kumar jain

A. K. YOG, J.

( 1 ) UDAI Singh Bhanuvanshi, petitioner, who is the tenant of residential accommodation on the first floor of house No. 118/408. Kaushalpuri, Kanpur Nagar (for short called the accommodation) comprising of two rooms, one store dochhatti verandah, aangan and bath room at the rate of Rs. 60 per month, has approached this Court by filing present writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India and seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated august 25, 2001 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) allowing landlords Rent Appeal No. 243 of 1995, Kunj Behari Tewari v. Udai Singh Bhanuwanshi, under Section 22 U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting. Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (for shorf called the Act1) arising out of the judgment and order dated November 8, 1995 passed by Prescribed authority under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Act in Rent Control Case No. 157 of 1993, Kunj Behari v. Udai Singh, dismissing the release application filed by the landlord Kunj Behari, son of brahm Dutt Tewari, under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Act (Annexure-6 to the writ petition ).

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the petitioner shows that the accommodation is in the tena























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top