IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S. N. Srivastava, J.
RASHMI DWIVEDI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. - Respondents
Writ Petition 3216 (S/s) Of 2002
Decided On : 01/01/2002
Discrimination - Employment - Article 16(2) of the Constitution of India - Clause 6 (Cha) of Government Order dated 26.5.1999 - Article 16(2)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of shiksha Mitra but was found ineligible due to being the sister of the Gram Pradhan, as per Clause 6 (Cha) of the Government Order dated 26.5.1999. The petitioner challenged the vires of Clause 6 (Cha) as discriminatory under Article 16(2) of the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not fall within the definition of descent as per Article 16(2) and upheld the validity of Clause 6 (Cha) as a reasonable classification to maintain discipline in the teaching cadre of basic education.
Issues: The issues revolved around the eligibility of the petitioner for the post of shiksha Mitra and the validity of Clause 6 (Cha) in the Government Order dated 26.5.1999 under Article 16(2) of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a reasonable classification is permissible under Article 16 of the Constitution of India, and the restriction in Clause 6 (Cha) was introduced to maintain discipline and prevent arbitrariness, favouritism, and nepotism in the selection process.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed by the court.
( 1 ) THE petitioner applied for appointment on the post of shiksha Mitra for Gram Sabha, govindpur, Kshetra Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. She was selected by a committee constituted under the Government Order No. 2604/15-15-99-282/98 dated 26. 5. 1999, namely, gram Shiksha Samiti.
( 2 ) THE Pradhan of the village is the Chairman of Gram Shiksha Samiti. The papers relating to the selection were submitted to the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Lucknow for approval. On complaint, a thorough inquiry was made by Assistant Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mohanlalganj who submitted his reported on 27. 5. 2002 on the ground that the petitioner is real sister of Gram pradhan and ineligible to be considered under the Government Order for the said post. On the basis of said report, order dated 27. 5. 2002 was passed.
( 3 ) ACCORDINGLY, by order dated 29. 5. 2002, the selection and the training in pursuance thereof of the petitioner as "shiksha Mitra" was suspended. The order dated 29/30. 5. 2002 passed by Basic shiksha Adhikari is Impugned in the present writ petition.
( 4 ) THE petitioner has challenged the vires of Clause 6 (Cha) of the Government Order dated 26. 5. 1999 which runs as follows : as ultra vires to the provisions of Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India being discriminatory on the ground of descent Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India is quoted below : no citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of any employment or office under the State. "
( 5 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner was rightly selected and is entitled to complete the training in pursuance of the said selection as "shiksha Mitra" and the order dated 29/30. 5. 2002 restraining him from training on the ground that she is Ineligible to be selected under Clause 6-Cha of the Government Order dated 26. 5. 1999 is ultra vires and discriminatory on account of Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India.
( 6 ) THE learned standing counsel opposed the contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner and urged that the impugned order as well as restriction contained in the Government order dated 26. 5. 1999 was rightly made strictly in accordance with law and is valid. The petitioner being the sister of the Gram Pradhan does not come within the definition of descent as contained in Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India. He further urged that restriction contained in the scheme relating to selection of a near relative of Chairman and secretary of Gram Shiksha Samiti is reasonable and was rightly made in accordance with law.
( 7 ) I heard contentions of learned counsel for the parties. The first contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the sister will come within the definition of descent and restriction contained in Clause 6-Cha of the scheme is discriminatory to the provisions of Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India, is wholly untenable in law.
( 8 ) WORD descent means, as defined in Blacks Law Dictionary, hereditary succession or "title by inheritance in all cases is descent. "
( 9 ) IN the present case, there is no question of any inheritance as Gram Pradhan, real brother of petitioner who is Chairman of Gram Shiksha Samiti is still alive. The petitioner is sister of present Gram Pradhan and will not come with the definition of descent.
( 10 ) CLAUSE 6-Cha in the scheme was rightly incorporated as policy decision in the interest of mass basic education.
( 11 ) CLASSIFICATION of near relative of the Chairman and Secretary of Gram Shiksha Samiti is reasonable classification which is constitutionally permissible. Near relatives constitute a separate class.
( 12 ) IT is settled in law that Article 16 of the Constitution of India is only an incident of the general concept of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India in the matter of employmen
REFRRED TO : Banarsidas and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.