SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 42

ANJANI KUMAR
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR COURT I, MEERUT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Bhushan, C.K.RAI

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners-State have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order of Labour Court (1st), u. P. , Meerut dated August 23, 1995, passed in Misc. Case No. 11 of 1993, whereby an application filed by the respondent-workman under Section 33-C (2) of Industrial Disputes act, 1947 has been allowed and a direction has been issued that the respondent No. 2 be paid salary w. e. f. July 4, 1987 to July, 1993 and also the bonus for the year 1987 to 1992, which comes to total of Rs. 1,55,821. 00.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners contended that the services of respondent No. 2 were terminated against which he has filed a writ petition before this Court being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15172 of 1987, which is still pending and in which interim order has been passed staying the order terminating the services of the concerned workman. The workman has come up with an application under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947, which shall hereinafter be referred to as act, that the quantum of salary has not been disputed. It is also not disputed that after passing of the interim order from the date of t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top