SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 226

ASHOK BHUSHAN
RAM KAILASH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandrajeet Yadav

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD counsel for the petitioner.

( 2 ) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the proceedings of Revision No, 41 of 1992, Ramshiromani v. Raj Murat, under Section 218 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act. The counsel for the petitioner has alternatively submitted that a direction be issued to the revisional court to decide the revision expeditiously. A revision has been filed by Ram Shiromani, i. e. , respondent No. 5 before the commissioner, Varanasi Division, Varanasi, against the order passed by the Sub-Divisional officer. Machhli Shahr, in case No. 16 under Sections 33/39 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the aforesaid revision was filed under Section 218 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act. He has submitted that Section 218 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act has been deleted by U. P. Act No. XX of 1997, hence there is no provision of Section 218 in the statute Book. The Commissioner has no jurisdiction to proceed with the aforesaid revision. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the above, the proceedings of the revision be











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top