SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 212

ANJANI KUMAR
LAXMIRATTAN COTTON MILLS – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR COURT (IV), U. P. , KANPUR AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.SINGH, DEVENDRA PRATAP, Rajesh Tiwari

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) BY means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-employer has challenged the award of the labour court dated 5. 2. 1996, Annexure-10 to the writ petition, in Adjudication Case No. 80 of 1989. The facts leading to the filing of present writ petition are that the State Government vide its order dated 14th June, 1989 as amended on 4. 9. 1989 referred the following dispute under Section 4k of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. 1947, for adjudication before the labour court. . . (VERNACULAR MATTER OMMITED ). .

( 2 ) THE parties have exchanged their written statements and rejoinder-affidavits and adduced their evidence. The labour court after considering the evidence on record and on the basis of the pleadings of the parties arrived at a conclusion that the workman concerned is entitled for the relief claimed for.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-employer has argued that the labour court has not considered the objection regarding the maintainability of the reference before the labour court on the ground that the workman concerned was not covered by the definition of employee as according




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top