RAKESH TIWARI, M.KATJU
SHAMBHU DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri V. B. Singh, learned Senior Advocate and Sri P. S. Bhagel Advocate for petitioner, and learned Counsel for the Central Government.
( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for respondent prays for and is granted 3 weeks to file counter-affidavit.
( 3 ) ISSUE notice to respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 returnable at an early date.
( 4 ) LIST peremptorily on 24. 3. 2002 on which date the petition may be finally disposed off. .
( 5 ) THE petitioner has prayed for quashing the panel prepared for the posts of Vice Chairman in various Benches of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT ).
( 6 ) SECTION 6 (2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 states :
"a person shall not be qualified for appointment as the Vice Chairman unless he is, or has been (or is qualified to be) a Judge of a High Court; or (a) has, for at least two years, held the post of Secretary to the Government of India or any other post under the Central or a State Government carrying a scale of pay which is not less than that of a Secretary to the Government of India; or (b) has for at least five years, held the post of an Additional Secretary to the Government of india or any other post
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.