SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 427

RAKESH TIWARI, M.KATJU
HARWINDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF ENGINEER KARMIK, U. P. JAL NIGAM, LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Poonam Srivastava, SHAKTI SWAROOP NIGAM, VIJAI SINHA

RAKESH TIWARI, J.

( 1 ) THE moot point for consideration in this bunch of writ petitions is whether the employees of the U. P. Jal Nigam are entitled to enhancement in their age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years, at par with U. P. Government servants by virtue of Government Order No. 1098/ka-1/2001, Lucknow dated 28th November, 2001.

( 2 ) THE background of the controversy has its roots in the enactment of the U. P. Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975. The petitioners were employees in the Local Self Government engineering Department of the U. P. Government. On enactment of the U. P. Water Supply and sewerage Act, (U. P. Act No. 43 of 1975) as amended by U. P. Acts No. 10 of 1978, U. P. Act No. 28 of 1978 and U. P. Act No. 5 of 1984, the U. P. Jal Nigam came into existence and by virtue of section 3 of the Act, the Nigam is body corporate.

( 3 ) THE contentions of the petitioners are that :

(i) Under Section 37 of the U. P. Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975, the service conditions of the petitioners stood preserved as that of a Government servant subject to making of rules by the U. P. Jal Nigam.

(ii) Since neither the U. P. Jal Nigam has framed any rules nor rules have






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top