SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 540

R.R.YADAV
VINDHYA VASINI – Appellant
Versus
PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.Singh

R. R. YADAV, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for petitioner and perused the orders impugned dated 22. 5. 2000 (Annexure-14) and 23. 3. 2002 (Annexure-15) to the writ petition.

( 2 ) IT is settled principle of law that a writ of certiorari is maintainable against final order after exhausting all the statutory remedy. Here, in the instant case, l/4th members of the society has initiated proceeding under Sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, before the Prescribed Authority. Preliminary objection was raised regarding jurisdiction before the Prescribed Authority. The Prescribed Authority by Impugned orders rejected the preliminary objection. The orders impugned passed by the Prescribed Authority are eminently Just and proper and do not require interference at this stage.

( 3 ) IT is held that the validity of the election depends upon the actual number of members of the general body of the society registered in Uttar Pradesh entitled (o participate in such election under bye-laws of the society. In those cases, where there is a doubt about election between two rival parties, then a reference is to be made to the Prescribed Authority by the Assistant regist






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top