SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 594

ANJANI KUMAR
RAKESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION IV, MATHURA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Janardan Sahai, Manish Kumar Nigam, VISHNU BEHARI TEVARI

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) BY means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order dated 9. 4. 1997, passed by respondent No. 1 on an application 66k filed by the petitioner, Annexure-5 to the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of present writ petition are that during the pendency of civil appeal, the sole appellant Ramesh Chandra Sharma died. According to the assertion made by the petitioner, Ramesh Chandra Sharma died leaving behind his adopted son Rakesh Sharma, the present petitioner. The respondent No. 5, Ramesh Chandra, son of Late Narayan Ji also filed an application for substitution on the strength of the will dated 14. 7. 1989 as legatee with the prayer that he may be substituted in place of deceased Ramesh Chandra Sharma. Smt. Sharda devi, the widow of Ramesh Chandra Sharma also filed an application claiming herself to be the only surviving legal heir. The present petitioner Rakesh Sharma and Ramesh Chandra, son of late Ram Narayan Ji have supported their case in support of their substitution applications, but none of them has been able to support their case, either by producing the succession







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top