SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 615

RAKESH TIWARI
LAL BAHADUR – Appellant
Versus
2nd ADDL. MUNSIF, FATEHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.Srivastava, Vijay Bahadur

RAKESH TIWARI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had been working as deed writer in Tehsil Fatehpur, District Fatehpur connected with the office of the Deputy Sub-Registrars office since 8/08/1986. He applied on 16-3-83 for renewal of his licence for the year 1983-84, which was recommended and forwarded by the Deputy Registrar. However, the licence of the petitioner was not renewed.

( 3 ) IT is alleged that the petitioner was threatened that his licence would be cancelled and as such he was compelled to file a suit for injunction restraining respondents Nos. 3 and 4 i. e. Collector, Fatehpur and the District Registrar, Fatehpur from interfering in the working of the petitioner as deed writer. The defendants put in appearance and filed the written statement and had given evasive reply to the allegations made by the petitioner in the plaint. The petitioner, therefore, prayed that the respondents be directed to give specific reply to the allegations made in the plaint. The copy of the plaint has been annexed as Annexure 1 to the writ petition. The English translation of paragraph 1 of the plaint is as under :"that the plaintiff had been working a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top