SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 726

RAKESH TIWARI, M.KATJU
SANGITA SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Devendra Pratap Singh, P.S.Baghel, R.G.PADIA, R.G.Tripathi

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner as lecturer in Home Science in the Allahabad University under Section 31 (3) (c) of the U. P. State Universities Act.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 3 ) IN paragraph 3 of the writ petition, it is alleged that there is a department of Home Science in the Allahabad University in which there are two sanctioned posts of lecturers and one post of reader. As regards the posts of lecturer in Home Science, one fell vacant in June, 1989 on the retirement of Mrs. S. Tiwari and the other post fell vacant in June, 1991 on the retirement of mrs. Rohini Bhatt. It is further stated that one post of Reader in Home Science is lying vacant since 1985 after the retirement of Dr. Radha Pant.

( 4 ) IN paragraph 5 of the writ petition, it is alleged that one post of lecturer in Home Science which fell vacant in June, 1989 was advertised vide advertisement No. 6 of 1989 but unfortunately, the Selection Committee did not meet. After one more vacancy arose, both the posts of lecturer in Home Science were advertised in 1991. Thereafter in June, 1993, tw





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top